From gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk  Tue Feb  3 22:09:53 2009
From: gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk (Gorry Fairhurst)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:09:53 +0000
Subject: draft-ietf-ipdvb-sec-req-09 passed for publication as an RFC - corrections.
Message-ID: <4988C0B1.1060904@erg.abdn.ac.uk>

The security requirements document has been passed by IESG for 
publication as an RFC.

The authors received comments during the Gen-ART review and also from
the IESG, relating to the interoperability of the different mechanisms
and specifically asking for guidance for implementors. The proposed
changes below are in response to these comments. These changes also 
address IESG comments on the use of security databases in the Appendix.

If accepted, these will be included in the published RFC. Please let the 
list (or me) know if you have any comments on these amendments. If I do 
not receive feedback by the 6th February, these will be passed to the 
RFC Editor.

Best wishes,

Gorry Faihurst
(ipdvb Chair)

---


In Abstract:

OLD:
     The MPEG-2 standard defined by ISO 13818-1 supports a range of
     transmission methods for a range of services.
                                ^^^^^
NEW:
     The MPEG-2 standard defined by ISO 13818-1 supports a range of
     transmission methods for a variety of services.
                                ^^^^^^^

In Section 5, para 2, please update text by adding new text at the
end of the paragraph:

OLD:
     Security services may be grouped into profiles based on security
     requirements, e.g. a base profile (with payload encryption and
     identity protection), and a second profile that extends this to
     also provide source authentication and protection against replay
     attacks.
             ^

NEW:
     Security services may be grouped into profiles based on security
     requirements, e.g. a base profile (with payload encryption and
     identity protection), and a second profile that extends this to
     also provide source authentication and protection against replay
     attacks. Although the use of specific security techniques is
     optional, it is RECOMMENDED that receiver devices should
     implement all the techniques in Reqs 2-5 of section 4,
     to ensure interoperability of all profiles.

In appendix A1.2. Please replace paragraph:

OLD:
     The design of these two databases may be based on IPsec
     databases as defined in RFC4301 [RFC4301].

NEW:
      While traditionally link layer security has operated using
      simple policy mechanisms, it is envisaged that ULE security
      should provide flexibility comparable to IPsec. the above
      design is based on the two databases defined for IPsec [RFC4301].
      These databases could be used to implement either simple
      policies (as in traditional link security services) or more
      complex policies (as in IPsec).

--





From MAILER-DAEMON at erg.abdn.ac.uk  Fri Feb 13 17:58:47 2009
From: MAILER-DAEMON at erg.abdn.ac.uk (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:58:47 GMT
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Message-ID: <200902131758.n1DHwloe026938@erg.abdn.ac.uk>

The original message was received at Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:58:44 GMT
from adsl-dyn172.78-99-34.t-com.sk [78.99.34.172]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
eng577 at eng.abdn.ac.uk   
    (reason: 550 unknown user)
    (expanded from: <mikegoh at erg.abdn.ac.uk>)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mailhub.abdn.ac.uk.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 unknown user
550 5.1.1 eng577 at eng.abdn.ac.uk   ... User unknown
<<< 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: <mikegoh at erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Subject: {Spam?} RE:"Hurry! Final Days to get 54% OFF!"
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:58:43 +0100
Size: 3014
URL: <http://erg.abdn.ac.uk/pipermail/ip-dvb/attachments/20090213/d29e7d2c/attachment.mht>

From gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk  Tue Feb 17 13:25:36 2009
From: gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk (Gorry Fairhurst)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:25:36 +0100
Subject: IPDVB WG at IETF-74
Message-ID: <499ABAD0.7020601@erg.abdn.ac.uk>


The ipdvb WG has not planned an official meeting for the IETF-74 meeting 
schedule. There *WILL* be an opportunity to meet any people who are 
interested in the work of this group, or who would like to bring new 
work to this working group - please do let me and/or Martin Stiemerling 
know if you have questions or if you'd like to meet face-to-face.

The following working group documents are currently past WGLC:

draft-combes-ipdvb-mib-rcs-04
- Currently in MIB-Doctor review.

draft-ietf-ipdvb-sec-req-09
- Currently in RFC-Ed queue.

There is currently one other documents associated with this WG:

draft-wan-ipdvb-rohc-02
- Currently individual submission.

Best wishes,

Gorry Fairhurst
(ipdvb Chair)



From gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk  Fri Feb 27 09:21:05 2009
From: gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk (Gorry Fairhurst)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:21:05 +0000
Subject: [Fwd: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4,
 2009]
Message-ID: <49A7B081.1090800@erg.abdn.ac.uk>


For your information,

Gorry

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Initial Version I-D Submission Deadline Extended to March 4, 2009
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:27:35 -0800
To: ietf-announce at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org, wgchairs at ietf.org

The IESG has extended the deadline for initial version (00)
submissions of Internet Drafts by 2 days (48 hours). The new deadline
is March 4, 2009 at 1700 Pacific (March 5, 2009 at  0100 UTC / GMT)
and the extension is for IETF 74 only.  The deadline has been extended
due to the copyright legend text alternative being recently finalized,
approved and implemented.

Please note that the date for updated I-D versions has NOT been
extended, and is still March 9, 2009.

Regards,
Alexa

-----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA  94538
Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris at amsl.com

Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS)
Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning
www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/>